Design Implications for Interactive and Analogue Technologies supporting Distance Education: A Longitudinal Mixed-Method Study during the Pandemic

Duarte L. Sousa, Pedro F. CamposVanessa Cesário

pp.  6 - 22, download






We believe that challenging times demand HCI education to pay attention to current real-life, complex, systemic problems. Therefore, we suggest an integrated framework for teaching HCI that involves combining the transition design framework, which suggests long-term, future-oriented design on a large scale toward more sustainable lifestyles, and speculative and critical design. The integration of the two creates spaces for dialogues and debates enabling students to take a more critical perspective concerning possible futures and technology design. We suggest studio-based pedagogy and explicate various aspects of the course, including its theoretical and practical underpinnings, pedagogical approach, and provide examples of projects to illustrate how the framework was used and ways in which speculative and critical design and thinking were crucial for learning. Finally, we highlight six learning facets that might contribute to orienting students’ upcoming professional work towards desirable futures.


Keywords: HCI in the pandemic. Design Implications. Multi-User Interaction /Cooperation. User Experience based approaches. Distance learning approaches. Teaching communities. Learning communities. User-centred design



1.    United Nations: Policy Brief: Education during COVID-19 and beyond,

2.    Mehrotra C., Hollister C.D., McGahey L.: Distance learning: principles for effective design, delivery, and evaluation, Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, Calif, (2001)

3.    Moore M.G., Kearsley G.: Distance education: a systems view of online learning, Wadsworth Cengage Learning, Belmont, CA, (2012)

4.    Holmberg B.: Distance education in essence: an overview of theory and practice in the early twenty-first century, Bibliotheks- und Informationssystem der Univ. Oldenburg, Oldenburg, (2003)

5.    Simonson M., Schlosser C.: We Need a Plan - An Instructional Design Approach for Distance Education Courses (2014)

6.    Van Lancker W., Parolin Z.: COVID-19, school closures, and child poverty: a social crisis in the making The Lancet Public Health, 5, pp. e243–e244 (2020)

7.    Kuhfeld M., Soland J., Tarasawa B., Johnson A., Ruzek E., Liu J.: Projecting the Potential Impact of COVID-19 School Closures on Academic Achievement Educational Researcher, 49, pp. 549–565 (2020)

8.    Ammirato S., Linzalone R., Felicetti A.M.: Knowledge management in pandemics. A critical literature review Knowledge Management Research & Practice, pp. 1–12 (2020)

9.    Sangster A., Stoner G., Flood B.: Insights into accounting education in a COVID-19 world Accounting Education, 29, pp. 431–562 (2020)

10.  Verikios G., McCaw J.M., McVernon J., Harris A.H.: H1N1 influenza and the Australian macroeconomy Journal of the Asia Pacific Economy, 17, pp. 22–51 (2012)

11.  OECD: Education and COVID-19: Focusing on the long-term impact of school closures,

12.  Harmey S., Moss G.: Learning disruption or learning loss: using evidence from unplanned closures to inform returning to school after COVID-19 Educational Review, pp. 1–20 (2021)

13.  Hanushek E.A., Woessmann L.: The Economic Impact of Learning Losses,

14.  Miller S.M., Ashdown B.K.: When COVID affects the community: The response of a needs-based private school in Guatemala Local Development & Society, 1, pp. 34–42 (2020)

15.  Palinkas L.A., Horwitz S.M., Green C.A., Wisdom J.P., Duan N., Hoagwood K.: Purposeful Sampling for Qualitative Data Collection and Analysis in Mixed Method Implementation Research Adm Policy Ment Health, 42, pp. 533–544 (2015)

16.  Vogl S., Zartler U., Schmidt E.-M., Rieder I.: Developing an analytical framework for multiple perspective, qualitative longitudinal interviews (MPQLI) International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 21, pp. 177–190 (2018)

17.  Henry D.B., Tolan P.H., Gorman-Smith D.: Cluster Analysis in Family Psychology Research. Journal of Family Psychology, 19, pp. 121–132 (2005)

18.  Holland J., Thomson R., Henderson S., London South Bank University, Families & Social Capital ESRC Research Group: Qualitative longitudinal research: a discussion paper, London South Bank University, London, (2006)

19.  Bryman A.: Social research methods, Oxford University Press, Oxford ; New York, (2012)

20.  Mortensen D.H.: Stage 1 in the Design Thinking Process: Empathise with Your Users,

21.  Taherdoost H.: Sampling Methods in Research Methodology; How to Choose a Sampling Technique for Research SSRN Journal, (2016)

22.  Liikkanen L.A.: Extreme-User Approach and the Design Energy Feedback Systems,

23.  Moore M.G. ed: Handbook of distance education, Routledge, New York, NY, (2013)

24.  Kvale S., Brinkmann S.: InterViews: learning the craft of qualitative research interviewing, Sage Publications, Los Angeles, (2009)

25.  Kallio H., Pietilä A.-M., Johnson M., Kangasniemi M.: Systematic methodological review: developing a framework for a qualitative semi-structured interview guide J Adv Nurs, 72, pp. 2954–2965 (2016)

26.  Marshall M.N.: Sampling for qualitative research Fam Pract, 13, pp. 522–526 (1996)

27.  Mcleod J.: Why we interview now--reflexivity and perspective in a longitudinal study International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 6, pp. 201–211 (2003)

28.  Burns A.: Collaborative action research for English language teachers, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge ; New York, (1999)

29.  Morse J.M., Niehaus L.: Principles and procedures of mixed methods design Walnut Creek, CA: Left, (2009)

30.  Henry D., Dymnicki A.B., Mohatt N., Allen J., Kelly J.G.: Clustering Methods with Qualitative Data: a Mixed-Methods Approach for Prevention Research with Small Samples Prev Sci, 16, pp. 1007–1016 (2015)

31.  Guest G., MacQueen K., Namey E.: Applied Thematic Analysis, SAGE Publications, Inc., 2455 Teller Road, Thousand Oaks California 91320 United States, (2012)

32.  Papert S.: Mindstorms: children, computers, and powerful ideas, Basic Books, New York, NY, (1993)

33.  Cuban L.: Oversold and underused: computers in the classroom, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Mass., (2001)

34. Lima L.C.V. da S., Pino I.R., Adrião T., Almeida L.C., Ferretti C.J., Zuin A.Á.S., Souza S.M.Z.L., Goergen P., Moraes C.S.V., Silveira A.D., Ximenes S.B., Rambla X.: CONFINAR A EXPERIÊNCIA ESCOLAR NUM ECRÃ? Educ. Soc., 41, pp. e240846 (2020)

35.  Noonoo S.: ‘Students Are Lonely:’ What Happens When Coronavirus Forces Schools Online | EdSurge News,

36.  Merrill S.: Teaching Through a Pandemic: A Mindset for This Moment,

37. Sas C., Whittaker S., Dow S., Forlizzi J., Zimmerman J.: Generating implications for design through design research Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. pp. 1971–1980. ACM, Toronto Ontario Canada (2014)





back to Table of Contents